Seyed Ali Mirkhalili; Ali Almasi; Rahmat Allah Sabzavari
Abstract
After World War II, the new world order was based on the discourse of liberal democracy, and the great powers sought to dominate all societies as the sole thought and model of governance, ...
Read More
After World War II, the new world order was based on the discourse of liberal democracy, and the great powers sought to dominate all societies as the sole thought and model of governance, and even Francis Fukuyama spoke of the end of history and the rule of liberal democracies. Brought up. With the victory of the Islamic Revolution, the discourse of Shiite Islam based on the teachings of Mahdism emerged as the third current in the world, which gradually created challenges for the discourse of liberal democracy. These two discourses, each based on a number of different and contradictory principles and components, led to different reactions in the Corona crisis from systems influenced by these two discourses, which gave meaning to life, social resilience, and calmed society. And the people's help to the health system and the governmental and governmental institutions in controlling it and guiding the society appeared. Using the analysis of Laclau and Mouffe's discourse, the present article, while comparing the floating and central signs of these two discourses, examines the distinction between these two discourses in the face of the Corona crisis and shows that serious crises shake the foundations of Western civilization. Has revealed.
